|
|
Volume 20, No. 1, February 2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ICTs and Agricultural Supply Chains Opportunities and Strategies for Successful Implementation
Sapna
A. Narula Faculty
of Policy & Planning, TERI
University, New Delhi, India
sapna.narula@teriuniversity.ac.in
Navin
Nainwal Amity University, Noida, India
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Abstract Indian
agriculture has the potential to dominate the global markets provided
post-harvest losses are minimized and the link between farmers and other
stakeholders can be established through ICTs. This article describes the
opportunities and challenges of agricultural supply chains in Introduction Information
Technology has revolutionized the farmers across rural areas all over
the world. ICTs (Information & Communication technology) can also do
wonders in empowering small and marginal farmers of developing
countries, who have poor access to information, especially regarding
customers and markets. In developing countries, the limiting factors for
farmers wanting to maximize their farm incomes are poor market linkages,
poor access to quality farm-inputs, services and technology, lack of
information about Government resources, institutions and extension
services. The farmers also lack real time information about consumers,
market demand and prices and hence are prone to more exploitation by
existing intermediaries in the supply chain. With the growth of
organized retailing and free global trade, farming is becoming highly
knowledge intensive, commercialized, competitive and globalised, making
it necessary to rebuild competitive and efficient agri-supply chains to
benefit both the farmer as well as the consumer. Agricultural
supply chains involve both backward as well as forward linkages among
all the stakeholders i.e. input companies, government institutions,
market intermediaries, consumers and farmers. At the back end of the
supply chain are private sector and public sector companies that
manufacture, trade and export inputs like seeds, pesticides,
fertilizers, farm machinery, etc. for the farmers’ use. Information is
also counted as an important input these days. Farmers need to have
information on farming practices, weather, sowing and harvesting time,
pest management, fertilizer use, etc. Farmers need information on new
products and brands launched by these companies. Information is the most
important input which can ensure the availability of all other required
inputs at the right place and right time. Presently, due to the lack of
proper information on inputs, advisory services, and weather and climate
information services, farmers are unable to align the quality and price
of their products to the market standards. Innovations
in ICT are helping to bridging the gap in the agri supply chain and
offering a communication platform to link farmers to the markets. Both
computer-based as well as mobile-based models have been adopted to
spread the information
in these countries. E-choupal,[v]
Warana, Grameeen Sanchar Society (Grasso),
Reuters
Market Light, AGMARKNET and Lifelines
are a few successful examples. Amongst the promoters are public sector,
not-for-profit sector and private sector companies who are targeting the
major stakeholder i.e. the farmer, with their unique information
delivery systems. A
strong need has been felt regarding the informational needs of the
farmers throughout agricultural value chain. (Table1). The farmer lacks
information regarding mandis, commodity prices at various mandis thus
delinking him from markets and consumers and making him prone to
exploitation in the hands of intermediaries. Information is needed by
farmers at every stage, right from sowing the seeds to selling his
produce in the mandis. Farmers lack awareness about
domestic/international markets as well as alternative market channels.
They must have information about what varieties are preferred by the
consumers and how the agricultural as well as post harvest management
practices can be employed in order to fetch better prices for their
produce. They also need information on Government schemes and funds
available to them for adopting new technologies/processes. Besides the
needs to obtain information, farmers also have an inherent desire to
interact with various peers and experts in order to discuss problems
related to agriculture. This can be possible only when they are
connected through an informational network specifically designed
according to their needs. For a company marketing information through
internet as well mobiles, there are a lot of opportunities existing at
both the ends. Table
1: Informational Needs of Farmers
Critical
Success Factors for Implementation of ICT Projects Despite
the efforts of the information delivering agencies, these projects have
a long way to go because of the challenges being faced at implementation
level. These challenges are mainly related to three areas as shown in
Table 2. Table
2: Critical Success Factors for ICT-Based Information Delivery
Most
of the Government funded IT initiatives provide free of cost information
to the farmers whereas some recently launched mobile based services such
as Reuters Market Light, Nokia Life Tools and Handygo
run on business models that involve payment of subscription charges.
There have been arguments earlier about whether farmers are willing to
pay for services or not. Experiments done by these companies have shown
that farmers are willing to pay for these provided they get the right
information at the right place and time.[vi]
However, the need and quality of service delivery is very
important for paid services. Economies of scale are also important for
sustainability of such initiatives. For any kind of ICT model to be
successful, it is necessary to generate a parallel revenue stream as has
been tried by e-choupal. To start with, Government funded projects get a
head start, but after some time the sustainability of these projects has
to be ensured through alternative income sources such as content selling
through input companies or paid services. ICT
initiatives typically require infrastructure in terms of hardware,
connectivity, electricity availability and internet availability. In a
remote village, irregular or no electricity supply, absence of fixed
telephone lines, inadequate bandwidth, etc. may limit the possibility of
running an IT kiosk successfully. Therefore, it is essential to ensure
availability of proper infrastructure in these areas. Public private
partnership could be one way of ensuring the availability of basic as
well as specialized infrastructure. It
has been seen in various cases that farmers only value need-based
quality information. A generalised content in these cases might not help
as farmers in different regions need different kinds of information.
Also, the informational needs are crop-specific as well as
time-specific. The farmers are also willing to pay for these services if
they help them enhance value of their output in both production as well
as market terms. Issues such as what information farmers need and when
need to be considered carefully. Some of the other important
considerations for delivering information to farmers are indicated in
Table 3.
The
mode of delivery of information to farmers and other rural folk is very
important. The ease of delivery of information with respect to language,
dissemination and readability should also be ensured in order to make
these initiatives useful as well as popular. Quite recently, there has
been a debate on which is the better medium of communication for
information delivery. - the Internet or the mobile? An Internet
based kiosk ensures that a large number of beneficiaries benefit from
the same kiosk and also have an added advantage of multimedia and
interactive communication. On the other hand, mobiles can deliver more
personalised and customised information. Nokia
Life Tools and Reuters Market Light are SMS (Short Message Service)
based services through which farmers get information on sowing time,
weather conditions and pest management practices from time to time. On
the other hand, Handygo services are based on voice based interactive
systems. The
success of these projects requires strong commitment of all
stakeholders. In the case of the public sector model, the state
agricultural marketing boards, local district authorities and extension
officials need to work with local agencies for data collection,
validation and delivery of service to the farmer. These initiatives are
launched because of push from higher authorities, but sometimes they
suffer in the hands of implementers because of lack of interest.
Therefore, commitment of the local staff is important to generate
interest and awareness among local user communities. Capacity
building of kiosk operators and other people involved is also very
important. In the case of IT kiosks, the kiosk operators need to be
capable of handling both the operational and technical aspects of IT.
Selection of kiosk operators is important so as to pick the most
suitable and committed people from the local community itself. Such a
person would be able to win the support of the local people. The
capacity building of the support staff is also important from time to
time in order to build their awareness, generate interest, and to keep
them motivated. Adequate
awareness of exiting initiatives has emerged as one of the important
challenges in this area as many a times people living in the same area
are not aware about IT kiosks or other services available. The
information providers have to ensure awareness among targeted
beneficiaries and users for their proper usage. Farmers and supply chain
partners must be made aware about the services available for their
proper use. Awareness campaigns, farmer melas, pamphlets, brochures etc.
help in generating awareness about relevant websites and services
available. Information
technologies can be the best way for farmers to update themselves on
information related to agri-inputs, credit, markets, weather, extension
advisory and other e-governance services, etc. Both mobile as well as
Internet based models can gain popularity among farmer folk as each of
these offer advantages. Internet can provide a range of services through
an interactive, web-based interface and multimedia to a large number of
beneficiaries at a minimal cost; however Internet connectivity,
electricity availability and capacity building are some of the
challenges before it. Mobiles, on the other hand are capable of
providing customized services and ensure speedy and timely delivery of
information. Hence the challenge is how both types of communication
technologies can be used based on region, crop, type of infrastructure
availability, and cost of infrastructure development. For empowering the
farmers through ICTs, there is a need to first have infrastructural and
operational modules, user friendly mode of delivery and right
product-service mix. However, the most important strategic issue before
these models is how these can be made sustainable on their own? Whether
to charge farmers or have alternate source of income generation for
sustainability remains the important question? Whether farmers are
willing to pay and for what services also needs to be answered through
further research studies in this area. § Narula, S.A. & Chopra, S. (2010) Identifying Stakeholders’ Needs and Constraints Adoption of ICT Services in Rural Areas: The Case of India forthcoming for Social Responsibility Journal (Emerald Publishers). § Narula, S.A., Singh, S.P., Chawla, K.L. & Sikka, B.K. (2009) Empowering Farmers Through Mobile Net Services: A Case of IFFCO-Airtel Alliance in India presented at International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development organized by BHU and Tennesse State University at Varanasi, Dec. 2009. §
§
§
§
Narula, §
§ Narula S. A., (2008) Leveraging ICT to Link Farmers to Markets: A Case of Indian E-Business Models Paper presented in International Conference on Technology and Innovation in Marketing held at IMT, Ghaziabad during 18-19 April, 2008. § Narula, S.A. & Sharma, N. (2008) Implementing ICTs in Agribusiness I4D, September, 20-22 available at www.i4donline.net/September08/September08.pdf § Narula, S. A. (2008) Leveraging ICT to Link Farmers to Markets: A Case of Indian E-Business Models in Rajat Gera (Ed.) “Technology and Innovation in Marketing”, Allied Publishers, New Delhi. § Narula, S.A. & Sharma, N. (2008) ICT and Agribusiness: A Suggestive Model based on Mckinsey 7S Framework paper presented in International Forum eIndia, 2008 held at Pragati Maidan, New Delhi, 2008. §
Sikka, B.K., Sharma, M.L., Singh, [i]
Aartiya is the common name for traditional middlemen in the
agricultural marketing system in [ii] Marketing infrastructure scheme is promoted by the Ministry of Agriculture for the development of agricultural marketing infrastructure in the country though financing of infrastructure projects. For more information, see www.agricoop.nic.in [iii] Rural Godown scheme is a financing scheme promoted by the Ministry of Agriculture to facilitate construction of storage facilities in rural areas to avoid post-harvest losses. [iv] AGMARKNET is an agricultural marketing information network of the Ministry of Agriculture through which all agricultural markets are connected through a portal. [v] ITC’s e-choupal has leveraged ICTs to deliver real-time information and customized knowledge to improve farmers’ decision making ability so that they can align farm output with market demands, improve their productivity, aggregate demand like a virtual producers’ cooperative, and access high quality farm inputs at lower costs. The model works at providing information on market prices in various mandis and at ITC procurement centres, allowing the farmers to take decision on where they want to sell their produce. |