|
|
|
|
Spreading the ICT Revolution in Rural India: Experiences and Examples
Sajan Venniyoor
Gitanjali Sah
|
|
|
NASSCOM Foundation, along with Rural Marketing Agencies Association of India (RMAAI), recently organized a seminar in New Delhi on 'Spreading the ICT Revolution in Rural India'. The seminar focused on the need for a more involved debate with the government and the role that public private partnerships can play in ICT for development. The major question that was raised was - why after almost a decade of ICT being applied to development, are we still talking about pilots and scaled pilots, and not of our successes beyond pilots? In order to resolve this issue, Sagarika Bose, Programme Manager at NASSCOM, sought insights and experiences of Solution Exchange's 'ICT for Development Community in India' on lessons that they have learned from attempts to scale up successes in the following two areas:
Professionals and practitioners from large well-established as well as small organizations who are either themselves trying to create a difference in rural areas through the still undiscovered potential of ICT or helping by being a part of such discussions to bring forth the value and benefits that can be captured through the use of ICT to craft a superior, healthier and improved civilization, participated in this discussion and contributed their views and shared their knowledge and experiences. Summary of Responses Scalability and replication of ICTD projects in rural Participants mentioned several projects that have moved beyond pilots. They listed social entrepreneurship projects like Drishtee and SKS Microfinance, and projects initiated by corporations like ITC’s e-Choupal, Hindustan Lever’s i-Shakti and Hewlett Packard’s photo training. Members also listed ICT projects in the agriculture sector that emerged from conferences in the late 1980s - DICNIC, AGRISNET, AgRIS, AGMARKNET, SeedNet, and DACNET- and others that provide relevant information to agrarian communities like eKrishi and RASI. Members cited ICT projects that provide services ranging from access to land records, empowering dairy farmers and marginalized women, and for providing information on livelihoods. They pointed out that most Indian ICTD projects lack global experience, and highlighted successful international projects from the Solomon Islands that give farmers access to new technologies, and from Africa, that use the internet for effective communication. Discussants outlined several factors critical for successfully scaling up ICT projects beyond pilots. They stressed that the planning state must have well-defined strategies, focusing on self-sustainability and incorporating a specific plans for scaling up, along with community involvement from the development stage. One suggestion to ensure scaling up is to roll out ICT projects in ‘phases’ rather than pilots. Further, they underlined the importance of creating a strong infrastructure and using appropriate Technology, including factoring in connectivity issues and regular maintenance. Another essential factor for success is to include research at every stage. Members cited the example of Media Lab Asia and suggested that universities (especially agricultural) and institutions of higher education each adopt one district and undertake all the research and development (R&D) activities for those areas. They also recommended studying businesses like retail, telecom and Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG), which have effectively penetrated rural markets despite constraints, to apply their learning’s to rural ICT projects. Along with planning and research, capacity building -
especially in technology - of communities by the implementing agency is
essential for the sustainability of the project. Based on their
experiences respondents felt it is necessary to provide ‘handholding’
to rural communities for quite some time. They pointed out that even
corporate ventures require a gestation period, during which the project
demands intensive support and attention by the promoters. In addition,
discussants mentioned the need for Localized content to succeed in any
rural set up in ICT projects in local languages and need-based content related to livelihood security tend to be more successful. Members also discussed the importance of resource generation for replication of projects. Since funding agencies support projects for a limited period and implementing agencies rarely have their own resources, it essential for projects to plan a model that incorporates a mix of paid services and social goods. Respondents recommended engaging the government in a more purposeful way to channelise its resources for making projects sustainable. Further, respondents highlighted the need for project
leadership to be well informed, open, transparent and accountable in order
to take projects to the next level. Scaling up depends on the willingness
of the leadership to learn and adapt, noting that businesses succeed
because of the decision-making capabilities at the highest levels of
management. At the same time, they pointed out that leadership is
essential at all levels of the project, including those operating at the
grassroots. Members recommended an integrated approach to ICT
projects, incorporating successful non-ICT interventions (assuming non-ICT
bases are the structure and the ICT interventions are the superstructures)
in the areas of health, education and livelihoods. Noting that NGOs tend
to understand ‘development’ better, while businesses know how to bring
projects to scale, respondents recommended using Public Private
Partnerships, with rural citizens as partners. Highlighting the importance
of such partnerships, they gave the cautionary example of Kerala’s
e-governance scheme and suggested that projects could possibly collaborate
with successful business ventures in rural areas. Respondents also shared various resources that list
relevant ICTD projects, and documentation on mainstreaming ICT to foster
inclusive growth and rural prosperity in
|